Run the Same Job Over Many Documents.

A workflow is the same job done over many documents, with a person in the loop where it matters. Describe it in plain language and edit the steps it builds.

Referral intakeTest with one itemRun

What should happen to each document?

e.g. For each referral, pull the resident's name…For each referral, pull the resident's name, date of birth, diagnosis and insurance. Flag anything missing a signed consent, let me review those, then draft a response letter and give me a spreadsheet of everything.
Describe it in your own words and the steps get built for you. You can edit every step afterwards.Build stepsBuilding the steps…Rebuild steps

STEPS

No steps yet. Describe the job above, or add steps by hand below.

Extract4 fields
↑↓
FlagMissing a signed consent → continue
↑↓
Review gateReview flagged items only
↑↓
GenerateWord document · Response letter - {{resident_name}}
↑↓
ExportXLSX · referrals.xlsx
↑↓
+ Add step
Referral intakeRunningAwaiting reviewCancel run

Started Oct 14, 2:02 PM · 6 items · 0 flaggedStarted Oct 14, 2:02 PM · 6 items · 2 flagged

Review: Consent check2 items waitingOpen to review items

ITEMS

DocumentExtractFlagReview gateStatus
Referral, R. Gomez.pdf✓✓✓In progressIn progress
Referral, L. Martin.pdf✓✓✓In progressIn progress
Referral, E. Shaw.pdf✓⚑In progressAwaiting review
Referral, F. Diaz.pdf✓✓✓In progressIn progress
Referral, A. Reed.pdf✓⚑In progressAwaiting review
Referral, H. Ford.pdf✓✓✓In progressIn progress

Updating every few seconds…

Referral intakeAwaiting reviewCancel run

Started Oct 14, 2:02 PM · 6 items · 2 flagged

Review: Consent check2 items waiting1 item waitingNo items waitingApprove all
Referral, E. Shaw.pdf⚑ flaggedRejectAsk for changes✓ Approve
resident_nameEdith ShawinsurancePrivate paydiagnosisHeart failure

⚑ needs review: no signed consent page found

What needs to change?

The consent is signed on page 4. Read it again.
Sent back to Flag, which redoes its work and returns here.CancelSend back
resident_nameEdith ShawinsurancePrivate paydiagnosisHeart failure

Sent back to Flag with your note.

Referral, A. Reed.pdf⚑ flaggedRejectAsk for changes✓ Approve
resident_nameAlice ReedinsuranceMedicaid waiverdiagnosisCOPD

⚑ needs review: consent signed, but the date is missing

resident_nameAlice ReedinsuranceMedicaid waiverdiagnosisCOPD

Approved. It continues to Generate.

Built from a description. Describe the job in your own words. The steps are built for you, and each one can be edited.

The run. Each document moves through each step. Anything uncertain is flagged, and the run pauses for a person.

A person at the gate. Approve an item, reject it, or send it back with a note to the step it came from.

How a Workflow Works

Built From a Description

Say what the job is. Seniorverse builds the steps, and you edit them. Teach it by example instead of writing a schema: show it one to three samples and it proposes the fields.

  • Composed in plain language
  • Fields proposed from samples or from your description
  • Or let it name whatever it finds
  • Edit any step before you run it

Steps That Do the Work

Each step either runs on every item or acts as a barrier across all of them.

  • Extract: named fields, or whatever it finds
  • Analyze: a freeform pass with your instructions
  • Generate: a document from a template
  • Flag: judgment against plain-language criteria, where uncertain always flags
  • Compile: one report across every item
  • Export: a spreadsheet of per-item values

A Person at the Gate

A review gate pauses the run. Approve an item, reject it to drop it, or ask for changes with a note that sends it back to the step it came from.

  • Every item, or only the flagged ones
  • Reject drops the item from the run
  • Ask for changes rewinds it with your note
  • Anything it was unsure about is flagged, not guessed

Bring Us Forty Documents

We will build the workflow on the call.